The 2026 Met Gala: Five Art-Worthy Highlights
- Coralie Tyler

- 16 minutes ago
- 3 min read
The 2026 Met Gala asked one question: What happens when fashion stops being merely worn and starts being read like art? This year’s exhibition, “Costume Art,” explores the dressed body as an artistic medium within the canon of art history and the connection between clothing and the human body. Its corresponding dress code, “Fashion is Art,” was meant to give guests permission to arrive as paintings, sculptures, muses, and other manifestations of art.
With all of that in mind, it has to be said that it was genuinely underwhelming to see what came of the Met Gala carpet. Many of the designers and attendees didn’t even try to honor the theme, leaving many of the dresses and tuxes to feel more like prom night than a high-profile gala. Some were cringey, and others were leather-centric.
It was a relief to find a few diamonds in the rough. Few looks not only nailed the dress code, but did so in an intentional, chic, and creative way. Here are my five highlights from the night:
Heidi Klum, look by Mike Marino

The Queen of Halloween did what she does best: she committed to the bit. Her look, inspired by Raffaelle Monti’s The Veiled Vestal, was especially clever as the work was famous for its contradiction, hard stone made to look like delicate, transparent fabric. The artist behind the look, prosthetic artist Mike Marino, inverted that trick using rubber and latex to imitate the authority of carved marble. It was not only theatrical, but undeniably on theme: Heidi Klum was not just dressed in fashion inspired by art, but as art itself.
Sabrina Carpenter in Dior

Sabrina Carpenter’s look was clever because it understood art as more than painting and sculpture. In a custom Dior gown made from strips of Sabrina, the 1954 film starring Audrey Hepburn, the pop singer arrived wrapped in the machinery of cinema itself. The look functioned almost like a wearable assemblage: fragments of film, image, glamour, and self-mythology layered across the body. It nodded to Old Hollywood, but also to the long acceptance of film, which is preserved, collected, and studied like any canvas or sculpture. Sabrina Carpenter, thanks to Jonathan Anderson, didn’t just reference a muse; she became the archive.
Emma Chamberlain in Mugler

In a hand-painted Mugler gown by Anna Deller-Yee, Chamberlain became less a wearer of fashion and more of a moving canvas. The look nodded to the expressive, intense brushstrokes of Vincent van Gogh and Edvard Munch, but also drew from Chamberlain’s childhood in an art-filled household and her father’s own paintings. The dress was not just inspired by art but treated it as an inheritance, a texture, and a form of self-portraiture. Of all her Met Gala looks, this is Chamberlain’s best to date.
Madonna in Saint Laurent

Madonna’s look belongs to the language of Surrealism, where the body becomes a site of dream, ritual, and symbolic disruption. In custom Saint Laurent, she drew from Leonora Carrington’s The Temptation of St. Anthony. Fragment II, translating the painting’s eerie dreamscape into a staged vision, a ghostly ship perched above her head, a sheer cape trailing behind her, attendants moving around her like figures from a myth. It was as though Carrington’s painted world had briefly escaped the canvas. The look reminded us that art history is not always conventionally pretty. Sometimes it is strange, symbolic, saintly, witchy, and more than a little haunted.
Anok Yai in Balenciaga

Yai’s Balenciaga look treated the body as both icon and sculpture. She drew on the tradition of Our Lady of Sorrows, a figure who has appeared throughout religious art and statuary, as an image of sanctity, mystery, mourning, and protection. The hood framed her face like a devotional panel, the prosthetic hair turned the head into an object of sculptural attention, giving the model an overall carved, ceremonial presence. The look carried the stillness of a religious icon, the tension of something both mythic and modern, making this perhaps a perfect interpretation of the dress code - art history and iconography reimagined through couture.
Ultimately, the strongest looks of the night were the ones that understood the assignment beyond surface-level spectacle. They did not simply gesture toward art with a painted print or a dramatic silhouette; they engaged with medium, movement, iconography, and the history of image-making itself. They treated the Met carpet as a gallery and the body as the site of interpretation.
The 2026 Met Gala may not have delivered the grand artistic crescendo its theme promised, but its finest looks reminded us why the Met carpet still matters. It proved that fashion is more complex than mere aesthetics - it can be studied, debated, remembered, and interpreted. Fashion, after all, is art in motion.


